Certainly most men take
pleasure in it, whether or not they are ashamed of it.
We see it in the older
fashion of prolonging the chorus of a song with syllables like “rumty tumty” or
“tooral looral.”
We see it in the similar but
later fashion of discussing whether a truth is objective or subjective, or
whether a reform is constructive or destructive, or whether an argument is
deductive or inductive: all bearing witness to a very natural love for those
nursery rhyme recurrences which make a sort
of song without words, or at
least without any kind of intellectual significance.
But something much deeper is
involved in the love of rhyme as distinct from other poetic forms, something
which is perhaps too deep and subtle to be described.
The nearest approximation to
the truth I can think of is something like this: that while all forms of
genuine verse recur, there is in rhyme a sense of return to exactly the same
place.
All modes of song go forward
and backward like the tides of the sea; but in the great sea of Homeric or
Virgilian hexameters, the sea that carried the labouring ships of Ulysses and
Æneas, the thunder of the breakers is rhythmic, but the margin of the foam is
necessarily irregular and vague.
In rhyme there is rather a
sense of water poured safely into one familiar well, or (to use a nobler
metaphor) of ale poured safely into one familiar flagon.
The armies of Homer and
Virgil advance and retreat over a vast country, and suggest vast and very
profound sentiments about
it, about whether it is their own country or only a strange country.
But when the old nameless
ballad boldly rhymes “the bonny ivy tree” to “my ain countree” the vision at
once dwindles and sharpens to a very vivid image of a single soldier passing
under the
ivy that darkens his own
door.
Rhythm deals with
similarity, but rhyme with identity.
Now in the one word identity
are involved perhaps the deepest and certainly the dearest human things.
He who is home-sick does not
desire houses or even homes.
He who is love-sick does not
want to see all the women with whom he might have fallen in love.
Only he who is sea-sick,
perhaps, may be said to have a cosmopolitan craving for all lands or any kind
of land.
And this is probably why
sea-sickness, like cosmopolitanism, has never yet been a high inspiration to
song.
G. K. Chesterton, Fanciesversus Fads, London, 1923.
Photo: Pixabay/newaztime
No comments:
Click Here To add Comment
Post a Comment
Blogger Widgets